楼上的译文都有错误，请看看我的翻译，我是极力根据原文英语结构直接翻译的。如果楼主感到满意请在这儿告诉我，我会把所剩下的英语文章抽时间给你补译文上。（括号内的东西是帮助您理解的）
The regime of the Author has also been, for us, the regime of "the Text"--a theoretical calcification which, in its apparent open-endedness, seems to exempt us from the work of defining what comprises the text, but which really only conceals our own belief in its ultimate determinacy as an identifiable, self-contained and self-consistent object of analysis.
对我们来说，“作者”的构思组织就是“文章”的提纲，----从理论上讲是一个起“骨架”（钙化）作用的东西， 在文章表面的起始两端，虽然这种提纲（这种起骨架作用的东西） 好像表面上免除了我们“对文章的组织进行定界“的运作，但是，实际上，提纲作为一种“可确认的且可独立完备的” 分析对象 ， 在最终确定文章方面，反而会掩盖我们自己的信念或观点看法。
Foucault points to this problem in noting that the concept of ecriture itself " in subtle ways, continues to perserve the existence of the author" to the extent that it " sustains the privileges of the author through the safe-guard of the a priori" ; brilliantly observed through this is, it does not answer for the larger problem of expressing, in theoretical and practical terms, exactly how the a priori status of writing is established--how (to put the question differently) writing passes from the condition of the "timely" to that of the "timeless."
Foucault提出了这种问题，他指出：“在精细的或微妙的写作方式中，写作自身的观念 ，就是继续持之以恒地维护作者的存在”，（其维持的程度是）---即通过“优先保护”而维持作者的特权 ；那么，通过这方面大量的和鲜明地观测(我们发现到的情况)是：写作观念不是用理论上的和实际上的词语来回答或负责大量（如何去）表达的问题，而是（确切地说）人们是如何建立写作上的优先“状态”的方法的---写作是如何从“受时间上的”条件限制转化到“不受时间上的”条件限制（的）（人们是如何以不同的方式提出问题的）。
More importantly, perhaps, it seems to me that the greatest impediment is the lack of a coherently articulated theoretical framework for the study of periodical genres,forms and media that might allow for the reassessment of the novel within a larger discursive economy.
在我看来---也许更为重要的是：最大的障碍是（人们）缺乏连贯清晰的理论框架来研究下列3中体裁：（1)“期刊体裁，(2)文艺作品体裁和(3)其它文学媒体，这些媒体在很不景气的经济内可能会考虑对小说进行重新评估。